From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Oct 18 14:23:03 2004
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 66724 invoked from network); 18 Oct 2004 21:23:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218)
  by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 18 Oct 2004 21:23:02 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2004 21:23:02 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJexK-0001LI-Bq
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:22:14 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJewS-0001KP-EI; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:21:20 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web51610.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.38.215])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CJevu-0001Jl-Fz
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:20:46 -0700
Message-ID: <20041018212012.60076.qmail@web51610.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [62.57.116.105] by web51610.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:20:12 PDT
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:20:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20041018182603.GL22470@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-archive-position: 8750
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com
X-list: lojban-list
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-From: jordi mas <jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com>
From: jordi mas <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: jordimastrullenque@yahoo.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: jordis
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23158

> > > The only other way I can think of off the top of
> my head to ask
> > > the second question is "xu do me la jordis poi
> fanva la
> > > abiUORD.".
> > 
> > Looks correct. Might you please use the top of
> your head again,
> > but this time without using the word "la jordis",
> which was
> > already understood from context?
> 
> I can't think of a way to use "du" without "la
> jordis" that wouldn't
> be stylistically ludicrous, at best.

No need to use "du". I was rather thinking of
something along the lines of "xu do me la jordis poi
fanva la abiUORD.", but just without the jordi.

If you cannot think of anything not ludicrous 
which satisfies these conditions, then I'll settle for
grammatical and understandable. 

--jordi



=====



		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail