From lojban-out@lojban.org Sat Oct 02 11:26:29 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 30638 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 18:26:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Oct 2004 18:26:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 18:26:28 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CDoaP-000686-PZ for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:26:26 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDoYl-000641-CO; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:24:43 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CDoYH-00063k-CQ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:24:14 -0700 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:24:13 -0700 Message-ID: <20041002182410.GV6536@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <1096703818.20.41460.m1@yahoogroups.com> <20041002181112.74302.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> <20041002181807.GU6536@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041002181807.GU6536@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 8694 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Poll results for lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23100 On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:18:08AM -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:11:12AM -0700, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > If we consider that similar polls in the past used to draw > > around 20 responses, this would seem to suggest that current > > lojbanists have the wrong idea about the true state of > > affairs... > > Were the past polls in Lojban? I'll answer my own question: What should be the default reply policy of this list? 44 What is/are the main reason(s) for your interest in Lojban? 78 Where do you want the lojban mailing lists to be hosted ? 21 xu do tcidu ro da poi ke'a notci fo le liste bau le lojbo 20 Do you support the new Lojban baseline policy statement posted to the list and found at http://www.lojban.org/llg/baseline.html? 22 e'o va'o lo nu do na pilno la'o zoi Yahoo groups zoi kei ko mrilu le do spuda la'o zoi jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar zoi ni'o pe'ipau la lojban cu nau mo lo ka ce'u bangu xokau prenu 6 So, the only other Lojban poll was *MUCH* shorter and simpler Lojban. In fact, I dare say that it's close to four times shorter and simpler, which is about the factor of difference in vote count. Also, the previous Lojban vote predates the non-Yahoogroups list. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!"