From rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 03 09:57:00 2004 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:57:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CPPNK-0007rA-MM for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:56:50 -0800 Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 09:56:50 -0800 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: na scope. Again. Message-ID: <20041103175650.GE25376@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20041102222605.GB10350@thedave.chch.ox.ac.uk> <20041103151216.72255.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041103151216.72255.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 8930 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 07:12:16AM -0800, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > I am doing the section on NA, which should cover some of that. My > intention is to propose an interpretation where the scope of {na} > is restricted to what follows it. This would change the meaning of simple negations like "mi na klama le zarci", would it not? Good mabla luck. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/