From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Nov 21 21:30:04 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 19109 invoked from network); 22 Nov 2004 05:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m8.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 22 Nov 2004 05:30:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Nov 2004 05:30:04 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CW6lg-0006xC-Ij for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:29:40 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CW6kx-0006vi-6e; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:28:55 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:28:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CW6kk-0006vX-Up for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:28:43 -0800 Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:28:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20041122052842.GB28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20041120170505.GO28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <41A10BCE.1090509@lojban.org> <20041122044115.GR28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <200411212359.05211.phma@phma.hn.org> <20041122050936.GY28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <1101100751.15743.9.camel@ben> <20041122052416.GZ28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041122052416.GZ28493@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-archive-position: 9033 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Archivist/Founders: {ri'a nai} vs. {se mau nai} X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23436 On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:24:16PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 09:19:11PM -0800, Theodore Reed wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 21:09 -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > > Oh, yeah, this is *sweeeeet*. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > > Assuming it actually parses, it sounds very good to me, although > > it invalidates a sizable amount of prior usage. > > You mean because it changes the meaning of {ri'a nai} and friends? > > Here's *every* usage of those in IRC. There are nine. Five of > those are either me or you. I'm sorry, ten. In addition, we have the following: mi nelci do mu'inai le nu do nelci mi i lo bratce gerpanzi fa'ani'a catlu abu sepi'o loi barda je cukla kanla gi'e ruble tengau lo xance gi'e troci le nu pencu abu i lu uu doi dirba li'u se cusku la alis sepi'o lo xlura tonga i abu mutce le ka troci le nu siclu i ku'i mutce terpa le si'o gy xagji noi la'a nibli le nu gy citka abu mu'inai le nu abu xlura The former is from the CLL, the latter is from Alice. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/