From lojban-out@lojban.org Mon Dec 27 21:04:36 2004 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 52820 invoked from network); 28 Dec 2004 05:04:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 28 Dec 2004 05:04:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Dec 2004 05:04:35 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9X4-00010t-D3 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:04:30 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9We-00010K-5v; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:04:04 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:04:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from south-station-annex.mit.edu ([18.72.1.2]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cj9WT-00010A-Cn for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:03:53 -0800 Received: from pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (PACIFIC-CARRIER-ANNEX.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.83]) by south-station-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53oRQ011498 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from grand-central-station.mit.edu (GRAND-CENTRAL-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.21.82]) by pacific-carrier-annex.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53m5A029186 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (OUTGOING-LEGACY.MIT.EDU [18.7.22.104]) by grand-central-station.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.9.2) with ESMTP id iBS53mgd023870 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from torg.mit.edu (TORG.MIT.EDU [18.208.0.57]) ) by outgoing-legacy.mit.edu (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id iBS53f20001324 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:03:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from rob by torg.mit.edu with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Cj9Wl-0004Wx-00 for ; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:04:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:04:11 -0500 Message-ID: <20041228050411.GA17068@mit.edu> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Is-It-Not-Nifty: www.sluggy.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-Spam-Score: -4.9 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.42 X-archive-position: 9125 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rspeer@MIT.EDU X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Rob Speer From: Rob Speer Reply-To: rspeer@MIT.EDU Subject: [lojban] mi xruti mi ti X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23522 After ceasing to follow Lojban for a semester because I was taking 6 classes, which was too many, I'm back. I've skimmed through the mailing list now. Here are the things that I've perceived as going on since September: * lots of awesome work has been done on the PEG morphology * something probably happened with xorlo, but I can't tell what * the scope of {na} was debated some more Indeed, what has gone on with xorlo now? Has there been more support for making {na} act like {naku}? And what else has happened? -- Rob Speer