From zefram@fysh.org Thu Jan 20 07:26:29 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fysh.org
	([83.170.75.51] helo=bowl.fysh.org ident=mail)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24)
	(Exim 4.34)
	id 1CreCU-0003P3-Ht
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:26:22 -0800
Received: from zefram by bowl.fysh.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CreCS-0004lg-00
	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:26:20 +0000
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:26:20 +0000
From: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: outer and inner quantifiers on "le"
Message-ID: <20050120152620.GF3649@fysh.org>
References: <20050120140217.GD3649@fysh.org> <20050120152013.16360.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050120152013.16360.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-archive-position: 9292
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: zefram@fysh.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

Jorge Llambías wrote:
>(Now, {pa fi'u re le nanmu} is another story.)

How so?  Is {pa fi'u re} not equivalent to {pimu} here?

-zefram