From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Fri Jan 21 07:02:57 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:02:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41902.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.153]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cs0JE-0000ym-QX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:02:48 -0800 Received: (qmail 91953 invoked by uid 60001); 21 Jan 2005 15:02:18 -0000 Message-ID: <20050121150218.91951.qmail@web41902.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.40.226.180] by web41902.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:02:17 PST Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 07:02:17 -0800 (PST) From: Jorge "Llambías" Subject: [lojban] Re: outer and inner quantifiers on "le" To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <20050120152620.GF3649@fysh.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9298 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --- Zefram wrote: > Jorge Llambías wrote: > >(Now, {pa fi'u re le nanmu} is another story.) > > How so? Is {pa fi'u re} not equivalent to {pimu} here? This is not firmly established yet, but the way I understand it: PA1 fi'u PA2 is PA1 out of every PA2 of the referents of "". So {pa fi'u re le nanmu} would be "one out of every two of the men", so "half the men" rather than "one half man of the men", which is what {pimu le nanmu} gives. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com