From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 16 12:28:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 25488 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2005 20:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Jan 2005 20:28:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2005 20:28:07 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CqH0I-0004pg-JO for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:28:06 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqGzl-0004on-UZ; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:33 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CqGza-0004od-Tk for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:23 -0800 Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:27:22 -0800 Message-ID: <20050116202722.GM10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20050114195516.GW22838@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <537d06d0050115032029bd6ac1@mail.gmail.com> <20050115201114.GB10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9277 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Opinions, please: SA by structure X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23660 On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:15:38PM -0600, Adam D. Lopresto wrote: > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > >You could also (probably; we haven't hashed this out yet) do {mi > >vecnu do lo cukta sa da sa lo cukta do}, effictively counting > >back two terms, but I don't actually expect anyone to do this. > >"da" was used as "any term" there. > > I don't see how that would work. It looks to me like the first > {sa da} would strip out {lo cukta} and replace it with {da}, > leaving {mi vecnu do da}, then the next {sa lo cukta} would turn > it into {mi vecnu do lo cukta}, and then a final {do} for {mi > vecnu do lo cukta do}. Err. Serry, there was supposed to be a {si} after {sa da} for just that reason. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/