From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Jan 06 17:43:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 89735 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2005 01:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 7 Jan 2005 01:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 7 Jan 2005 01:43:49 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CmjAL-0007xl-JY for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:49 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmjAA-0006kT-AS; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:38 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cmj9x-0003OA-Ex for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 17:43:25 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2D7BD84A7; Fri, 7 Jan 2005 01:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:42:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050106155148.6701.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050106155148.6701.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200501062042.45756.phma@phma.hn.org> X-archive-position: 9191 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.hn.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Metric units X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23583 On Thursday 06 January 2005 10:51, Jorge "Llambías" wrote: > --- Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > We should be very cautious about introducing new gismu. But if we do > > introduce a new gismu, we should at least make sure that it has a unique > > four-letter rafsi. > > {.enri} or {.e'enri} then. I think {xe'enri} would be better since it can be combined with a prefix without using {zei}. Most of the henries I've seen are milli or micro. phma -- Without glasses, I can't even distinguish smells... -Les Perles de la médecine