From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 23 18:27:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 5601 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 02:27:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Jan 2005 02:27:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 02:27:21 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cstwl-0002OZ-Tu for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:19 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cstwe-0002O5-9i; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:12 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CstwT-0002Nm-Ts for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:01 -0800 Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 18:27:01 -0800 Message-ID: <20050124022701.GY2342@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20050124022526.GX2342@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050124022526.GX2342@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9324 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "But if that were true..." X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23705 On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:25:26PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I found myself with: > > mi pacna lo nu na broda > > Where broda was very complicated, and wanting to say "but *if* it > were true, then". > > I used > > .i ku'i lo ja'a se go'i ja'a mukti ... Err, except the second {ja'a} was actually {cu da'i}. Did I mention I'm sick? -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/