From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Jan 26 05:29:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 57126 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2005 13:29:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Jan 2005 13:29:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Jan 2005 13:29:10 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CtnEL-0004Zj-0R for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:29:09 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CtnDk-0004Yf-Js; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:28:32 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:28:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41903.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.154]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CtnDO-0004Y1-Py for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:28:10 -0800 Received: (qmail 61855 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Jan 2005 13:27:40 -0000 Message-ID: <20050126132740.61853.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.40.181.146] by web41903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:27:39 PST Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:27:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9344 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: minimal lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23725 --- xah lee wrote: > i haven't learned about KOha, {mi}, {do}, {ta} are all members of KOhA, so you have learned at least some part of it. KOhA contains all the pronouns. > I, If you say more than one sentence, you normally separate them with {.i}. > UI... Those are the attitudinals, a very important part of lojban. > but i know there are bo and (ke, > ke'i)... surely lojban isn't complete without these?? ke and ke'e are very rarely used. bo is more often used in the {i bo} or the {na'e bo} constructions than in tanru. In the end it's a matter of taste whether you think ke-ke'e, bo or co is more essential for lojban. I wouldn't include bo and ke-ke'e in my minimal lojban, but that's just my point of view. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com