From jorne@eubot.com Tue Jan 25 10:16:01 2005
Return-Path: <jorne@eubot.com>
X-Sender: jorne@eubot.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 53727 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2005 18:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217)
  by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Jan 2005 18:16:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lakermmtao02.cox.net) (68.230.240.37)
  by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2005 18:16:01 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (really [70.179.101.17]) by lakermmtao02.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP
          id <20050125181553.CBN2202.lakermmtao02.cox.net@[127.0.0.1]>
          for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:15:53 -0500
Message-ID: <41F68CDB.1020301@eubot.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:15:55 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 68.230.240.37
From: Brian Eubanks <jorne@eubot.com>
Subject: Should I have used "nu"?
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=211033105
X-Yahoo-Profile: eubanksb
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23715


Now I'm wondering if I should have used:

ko viska le nu la spat. bajra

instead of

ko viska le du'u la spat. bajra


mi'e la iuban.