From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Thu Jan 06 07:52:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 27857 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2005 15:52:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 6 Jan 2005 15:52:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2005 15:52:50 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CmZwP-0004MC-GR for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:52:49 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmZw5-0004Lp-GF; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:52:29 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41903.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.154]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CmZvv-0004L3-0H for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:52:19 -0800 Received: (qmail 6703 invoked by uid 60001); 6 Jan 2005 15:51:48 -0000 Message-ID: <20050106155148.6701.qmail@web41903.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41903.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:51:47 PST Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 07:51:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-archive-position: 9179 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Metric units X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23571 --- Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, Jorge Llambías wrote: > >> henry > > xenri > > > > (It would have clashed with xenru with the gismu algorithm, > > but I don't think that's a problem here.) > > I think it is a problem. > > We should be very cautious about introducing new gismu. But if we do > introduce a new gismu, we should at least make sure that it has a unique > four-letter rafsi. {.enri} or {.e'enri} then. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail