Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:51:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from n13a.bulk.scd.yahoo.com ([66.94.237.24]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CtAFK-0005JE-AM for lojban-in@lojban.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:51:34 -0800 Received: from [66.218.69.4] by n13.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2005 19:51:03 -0000 Received: from [66.218.66.27] by mailer4.bulk.scd.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2005 19:51:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: groups-email X-Sender: a.rosta@v21.me.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 19539 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2005 19:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 24 Jan 2005 19:51:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk) (62.41.128.20) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2005 19:51:01 -0000 Received: from sonyvaio ([217.140.36.118]) by heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id j0OHhHS18752 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 17:43:17 GMT Message-ID: <000f01c5024d$f97b1e60$76248cd9@sonyvaio> To: References: <20050123134301.99212.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 62.41.128.20 From: "And Rosta" X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin MIME-Version: 1.0 Mailing-List: list lojban@yahoogroups.com; contact lojban-owner@yahoogroups.com Delivered-To: mailing list lojban@yahoogroups.com Precedence: bulk Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:43:09 -0000 Subject: [lojban] Re: outer and inner quantifiers on "le" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-archive-position: 9326 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: a.rosta@v21.me.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Content-Length: 1963 Lines: 64 xorxes: > --- And: >> Anyway, the half-an-apple reading has some strange consequences: >> >> pi mu (lo) plise cu se citka >> = pi mu da poi plise cu se citka >> = pi mu da ge plise gi se citka >> = "Half something is an apple and is eaten" >> >> Now *that* looks like gobbledygook! > > Yes, but it is still almost gobbledygook under the other > interpretation: "one out of every two things is both an apple > and is eaten". > > The move from restricted to unrestricted quantificaton for > fractional quantifiers, under any interpretation, won't work > like for regular quantifiers. True. But partitive fractional quantifiers will not make sense with any {da}, whereas 'frequency'/'incidence' fractional quantifiers will at least make sense with restricted da. >> Likewise, if {mi citka pi mu plise}, is the cardinality of {lo'i se citka >> plise} 0.5? Hardly. > > That doesn't bother me so much, it is a reasonable extension of the > idea of cardinality. To my unmathematical mind, cardinalities must be positive integers (or 0); nothing else makes sense. > It seems to me that any convention we adopt will have its unintuitive > side, so it's just a question of what is more useful. In that case, I suppose {pi mu lo'i broda} might serve for "one in every two broda". --And. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater? Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good! http://us.click.yahoo.com/TzSHvD/SOnJAA/79vVAA/GSaulB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/lojban/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: lojban-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/