From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Jan 11 00:00:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 35395 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2005 08:00:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 11 Jan 2005 08:00:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2005 08:00:01 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CoGwa-0001tI-MN for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CoGw3-0001sj-TF; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:59:27 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from a.mx.zettai.net ([207.58.154.6]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1CoGvr-0001sY-Sw for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:59:16 -0800 Received: (qmail 88072 invoked by uid 89); 11 Jan 2005 07:59:13 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.0.8 ppid: 88050, pid: 88067, t: 0.6344s scanners: clamav: 0.80/m:28/d:625 spam: 3.0.1 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.42?) (mail@raphael.poss.name@81.56.52.12) by 0 with SMTP; 11 Jan 2005 07:59:13 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <737b61f30501102006796a00ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <737b61f30501102006796a00ae@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-9-421683752" Message-Id: Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:00:18 +0100 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on beta.zettai.net X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-archive-position: 9227 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: grey.havens@online.fr X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Poss?= From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Rapha=EBl_Poss?= Reply-To: grey.havens@online.fr Subject: [lojban] Re: pronunciation with cmavo and brivla X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23616 --Apple-Mail-9-421683752 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 11 janv. 05, =E0 05:06, Chris Capel a =E9crit : > The reference grammar, chapter 4, section 2, example 2.8, says that to > pronounce "le RE NANmu", you need to say "le RE. NANmu". The pause is > required, it says, because otherwise it could confuse someone about > NAN being the first syllable of nanmu. But isn't this ambiguity taken > care of by nanmu's CVC/CV form? Why is the pause necessary in > addition? Strictly speaking, it's not necessary, but it's a favour you can offer=20 to your listener, esp. if they're not yet fluent with lojban. --=20 Rapha=EBl --Apple-Mail-9-421683752 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ceci_est_une_signature_=E9lectronique_PGP?= content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit [Attachment content not displayed.] --Apple-Mail-9-421683752--