From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 09 16:21:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 15675 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 00:21:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2005 00:21:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 00:21:33 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnJ1-0004V7-Jz for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:21:11 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnIs-0004Uc-FO; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:21:02 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnIX-0004UJ-Sd for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:20:41 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:20:41 -0800 Message-ID: <20050110002041.GK4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <21c51f21ad38.21ad3821c51f@imap.epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21c51f21ad38.21ad3821c51f@imap.epfl.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9210 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK gadri X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23602 On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 07:37:03PM +0100, GREGORY DYKE wrote: > I don't know whether more noise has been made elsewhere. I don't follow that. > The gadri issue is the reason I have been on break from lojban and > more particularly the chrestomathy. Does this mean we'll see more of you soon? > That you have succeeded in crafting a proposal which has satisfied > all parties (even And ;) ) is muchly to the BPFK's credit! > > Well done! Seriously, this is one of the biggest breakthroughs > since I've been involved in the language and deserves great > notice. > > Thanks to all Thank you for taking the time to say such nice things! -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/