From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 09 16:21:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 89375 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2005 00:21:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Jan 2005 00:21:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Jan 2005 00:21:20 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnJ9-0004VX-Ik for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:21:19 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnIT-0004UD-A0; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:20:37 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:20:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CnnI4-0004Tw-KZ for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 16:20:12 -0800 Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:20:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20050110002012.GJ4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20050109105912.GG4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <002d01c4f66f$a5a0d440$42e1fea9@oemcomputer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002d01c4f66f$a5a0d440$42e1fea9@oemcomputer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9209 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: BPFK gadri X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23601 On Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 01:11:25PM -0000, And Rosta wrote: > > Robin has asked me to state here my view that the BPFK proposals > for gadri are sound and successful. I think the proposals are an > admirable compromise between consistency with pre-BPFK Lojban and > consistency with the needs for logical coherence and expressive > power. If there are still any questionmarks in my mind (or > expressed in my messages), this doesn't mean I think the current > proposal is not fundamentally sound. But most encouraging of all > is that the BPFK has proved that it can achieve its objectives, > for all that at one time they seemed an impossibly huge mountain > to climb. > > Again, sincere congratulations to Robin, xorxes & the rest of the > BPFK team. Thanks, And. I really appreciate it. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/