From lojban-out@lojban.org Sun Jan 16 11:17:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 55785 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2005 19:17:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m13.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 16 Jan 2005 19:17:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Jan 2005 19:17:16 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CqFtZ-0003tT-Nb for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:17:05 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CqFsr-0003sw-WD; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:16:22 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:16:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu ([128.252.21.14]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34) id 1CqFsg-0003sZ-VM for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 11:16:11 -0800 Received: from hive.cec.wustl.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0GJFcEE024933; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:15:38 -0600 Received: from localhost (adam@localhost) by hive.cec.wustl.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id j0GJFc3P024930; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:15:38 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: hive.cec.wustl.edu: adam owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:15:38 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <20050115201114.GB10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Message-ID: References: <20050114195516.GW22838@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <537d06d0050115032029bd6ac1@mail.gmail.com> <20050115201114.GB10940@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-archive-position: 9276 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adam@pubcrawler.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: "Adam D. Lopresto" From: "Adam D. Lopresto" Reply-To: adam@pubcrawler.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Opinions, please: SA by structure X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23659 On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > You could also (probably; we haven't hashed this out yet) do {mi > vecnu do lo cukta sa da sa lo cukta do}, effictively counting back > two terms, but I don't actually expect anyone to do this. "da" was > used as "any term" there. I don't see how that would work. It looks to me like the first {sa da} would strip out {lo cukta} and replace it with {da}, leaving {mi vecnu do da}, then the next {sa lo cukta} would turn it into {mi vecnu do lo cukta}, and then a final {do} for {mi vecnu do lo cukta do}. -- Adam Lopresto http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/ Why doesn't Tarzan have a beard?