From a.rosta@v21.me.uk Sun Jan 09 09:21:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: a.rosta@v21.me.uk X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 8163 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2005 17:21:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jan 2005 17:21:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk) (62.41.128.20) by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2005 17:21:45 -0000 Received: from oemcomputer (host81-7-57-163.surfport24.v21.co.uk [81.7.57.163]) by heineken.flexi-surf.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id j09FLES01936 for ; Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:21:15 GMT Message-ID: <002d01c4f66f$a5a0d440$42e1fea9@oemcomputer> To: References: <20050109105912.GG4597@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 13:11:25 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 62.41.128.20 From: "And Rosta" Subject: BPFK gadri X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=175222075 X-Yahoo-Profile: andjamin X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23597 Robin has asked me to state here my view that the BPFK proposals for gadri are sound and successful. I think the proposals are an admirable compromise between consistency with pre-BPFK Lojban and consistency with the needs for logical coherence and expressive power. If there are still any questionmarks in my mind (or expressed in my messages), this doesn't mean I think the current proposal is not fundamentally sound. But most encouraging of all is that the BPFK has proved that it can achieve its objectives, for all that at one time they seemed an impossibly huge mountain to climb. Again, sincere congratulations to Robin, xorxes & the rest of the BPFK team. --And.