From treed@surreality.us Thu Feb 03 17:48:49 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:48:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from 70-32-97-160.ontrca.adelphia.net ([70.32.97.160] helo=localhost) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1CwsaO-0003Za-JG for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:48:40 -0800 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwsar-0000is-8v for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:49:09 -0800 Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban official reference licensing From: Theodore Reed To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hvxLUbynclreakw6WTD3" Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 17:49:06 -0800 Message-Id: <1107481746.17878.54.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.1.2 X-archive-position: 9422 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --=-hvxLUbynclreakw6WTD3 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 06:33 -0800, Xah Lee wrote: > i'm interested in mirroring the official lojban reference > http://lojban.org/publications/reference_grammar/chapter1.html > then gradually edit it into to my needs as i read it. (so as to generate = a > tutorial from different perspective) >=20 > The licensing has this clause: >=20 > Permission is granted to copy and distribute modified versions of this bo= ok, > provided that the modifications are clearly marked as such, and provided > that the entire resulting derived work is distributed under the terms of = a > permission notice identical to this one. >=20 > this requirement for marking modified places is a bit impractical to foll= ow. > Is it possible to change this? Perhaps replacing it with something like a > clear notification that this is a modified version? >=20 > thanks. Like Robin, not speaking as a board member, but I think that if you were just adding notes for yourself and had no intentions of distributing it, it would probably fall under fair use. mu'omi'e bancus --=-hvxLUbynclreakw6WTD3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCAtSRw24JwM4aDNwRAjM0AJ0fd3R21H16qRarwP5F0THkmEca7gCfbMhQ L2NHXlRAwO9bWQEmqfX6hlE= =MfFQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hvxLUbynclreakw6WTD3--