From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Tue Feb 01 11:15:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 47154 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2005 19:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m14.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 1 Feb 2005 19:15:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2005 19:15:31 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cw3Up-0005Jp-MC for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:15:31 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cw3UJ-0005J7-Q3; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:14:59 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:14:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41908.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.159]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cw3U7-0005IT-4m for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:14:47 -0800 Received: (qmail 30501 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Feb 2005 19:14:16 -0000 Message-ID: <20050201191416.30499.qmail@web41908.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41908.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:14:15 PST Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:14:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050201164525.56940.qmail@web81308.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9395 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Minimal Lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23774 --- John E Clifford wrote: > >Insofar as Lojban is a language based on logic, > the strict minimum > >would be brivla, PA, KOhA, and I JA (or the > corresponding Polish > >notation). Also: NOI-KUhO, if you want to include restricted quantification. ZOhU, SE or FA, otherwise you can only quantify in the default order imposed by the brivla arguments. SE and FA are probably not enough for all cases though, so make it ZOhU. XI so you don't run out of variables. TUhE-TUhU, otherwise you can't get all groupings of the connectives. (If you use GA GI instead if I JA you don't need these.) NA and probably KU as well, for negations. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com