From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 02 07:44:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 47358 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 15:44:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2005 15:44:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 15:44:41 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMgK-0003DX-LX for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:44:40 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMfp-0003D1-VR; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:44:10 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41905.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.156]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwMfe-0003CV-Nx for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:43:58 -0800 Received: (qmail 53638 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2005 15:43:27 -0000 Message-ID: <20050202154327.53636.qmail@web41905.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41905.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 07:43:27 PST Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 07:43:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050202150305.8284.qmail@web81303.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9405 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Minimal Lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23782 --- John E Clifford wrote: > Standard logic -- when it wants to dispense with > parentheses without going Polish -- has a system > of depth tags (usually something like ', '', ... > or ., :, and so on). Can {bo} be repeated to > give closer and closer bindings? Not with the current grammar, no. > Or subscripted? Yes. The parse tree in this case won't reflect any difference in binding, but this would not be the only place in the grammar where the parse structure does not reflect the logical structure anyway. mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail