From jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Wed Feb 02 10:57:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 16086 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2005 18:57:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 2 Feb 2005 18:57:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2005 18:57:35 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPge-0006Vw-KW for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:57:12 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPg5-0006VK-Nq; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:56:37 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:56:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41901.mail.yahoo.com ([66.218.93.152]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CwPfu-0006Ur-42 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:56:26 -0800 Received: (qmail 13052 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2005 18:55:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20050202185552.13050.qmail@web41901.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.49.74.2] by web41901.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:55:52 PST Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:55:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20050202170906.69590.qmail@web81308.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 9409 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 From: Jorge "Llambías" Reply-To: jjllambias2000@yahoo.com.ar Subject: [lojban] Re: Minimal Lojban X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=142311107 X-Yahoo-Profile: jjllambias2000 X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23786 --- John E Clifford wrote: > Loglan had a cmavo > corresponding to a standard logic abbreviation to > indicate that the following chunk was to be taken > as a unit wrt left grouping: essentially a left > parenthesis without a matching right. The test > sentence would then be {p ija X q ijo r ije s}, a > more manageable chunk. Is that flag -- the X > here -- still around (I don't even know what to > look up to search for it). Since {tu'u} is elidable, X would be just {tu'e}. (Or {ke} for tanru/sumti/bridi-tail.) mu'o mi'e xorxes __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250