From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Feb 03 10:31:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 27840 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2005 18:31:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m22.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 3 Feb 2005 18:31:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2005 18:31:41 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1CwllT-0004Bf-Cs for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:39 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwlkw-0004Az-Ic; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:06 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:31:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.34) id 1Cwlkj-0004Ap-C9 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2005 10:30:53 -0800 Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:30:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20050203183053.GA15972@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <2fe67a300571.3005712fe67a@imap.epfl.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fe67a300571.3005712fe67a@imap.epfl.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9417 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban official reference licensing X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23794 On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 04:32:45PM +0100, GREGORY DYKE wrote: > I do not represent the LLG in saying this, but no: The reference > grammar is the formal grammar of lojban, for public viewing. Any > modifications must also indicate place of modification, lest > people no longer know what is canon. While I'm inclined to agree, what you said is not actually true. The formal grammars in the index of the CLL are (currently; this is expected to change) the formal grammar of Lojban. They are also in the public domain. The CLL is an explication of the semantics of Lojban. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/