From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Mar 18 16:08:03 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DCRVT-0001et-Nt
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:07:55 -0800
Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan)
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DCRVS-0001ej-9X
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 16:07:55 -0800
Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id D42335F13; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:07:20 +0000 (UTC)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.hn.org>
Organization: dis
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] SE with conjunctions
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:07:11 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.5
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200503181907.12189.phma@phma.hn.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 9615
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

SE is grammatical with both logical and non-logical conjunctions, but the only 
usage mentioned in the refgram is {se} with logical conjunctions, of which 
the only ones it makes a difference with are {u/ju/gi'u/gu'u/gu}. What does 
{te ju} mean? Does {se} make a difference with any JOI (I think it should 
with {ce'o}, {fa'u}, and, if I understand it right, {pi'u})?

phma
-- 
Maintenant, j'ai besoin d'une loupe pour trouver mes lunettes!
	-Les Perles de la médecine