From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Mar 11 16:51:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 59776 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2005 00:51:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2005 00:51:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2005 00:51:53 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9urA-0007CA-P9 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:52 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D9uqt-0007Bp-N9; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:37 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9uqi-0007Ba-B6 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:24 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9uqi-0007BT-8m for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:24 -0800 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:51:24 -0800 Message-ID: <20050312005124.GU16527@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9564 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] [Archivists] skapi vs. pilka? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23927 Mail between xorxes: > I think this is pilka more than skapi. > skapi is the material, it is the pilka once > it has been removed from the animal. and I: > I disagree. skapi need not have been removed, and pilka includes > fruit rinds and so on. I'm going to ask the archivists about > this. I hereby invoke the supplicatory model. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/