From lojban-out@lojban.org Thu Mar 10 13:29:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 130 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2005 21:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166) by m2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Mar 2005 21:29:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 21:29:15 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9VDW-0004Oj-L9 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:29:14 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D9VDM-0004OD-UR; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:29:07 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9VDB-0004Nu-Rc for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:28:53 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9VDB-0004Nn-PV for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:28:53 -0800 Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:28:53 -0800 Message-ID: <20050310212853.GA16527@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20050310211623.C9E1076C5C@isis.visi.com> <20050310212454.GP3265@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050310212454.GP3265@chain.digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i X-archive-position: 9558 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -5.3 (-----) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:24:54PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:16:23PM -0600, dean@VISI.COM wrote: > > > > Would it be possible for the spam headers on messages to be > > eliminated if the spam score is negative (as it appears to be > > for the most recent messages)? > > It's probably possible, but I haven't the slightest idea how to do > it. I just followed the exiscan instructions when I set it up. > > Actually, I could do it with formail. I'll see what I can do. [...] Content analysis details: (-5.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -3.3 ALL_TRUSTED Did not pass through any untrusted hosts -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Spam markings X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23921 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:24:54PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:16:23PM -0600, dean@VISI.COM wrote: > > > > Would it be possible for the spam headers on messages to be > > eliminated if the spam score is negative (as it appears to be > > for the most recent messages)? > > It's probably possible, but I haven't the slightest idea how to do > it. I just followed the exiscan instructions when I set it up. > > Actually, I could do it with formail. I'll see what I can do. Test of same. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/