From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Mar 11 17:18:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 60987 invoked from network); 12 Mar 2005 01:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 12 Mar 2005 01:18:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Mar 2005 01:18:14 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9vGg-0007ml-Cs for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:18:14 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D9vGC-0007lr-RR; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:17:45 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:17:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.44) id 1D9vG2-0007li-3g for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:17:34 -0800 Received: from phma.hn.org ([216.189.113.165] helo=blackcat.ixazon.lan) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1D9vG0-0007lE-Sw for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:17:34 -0800 Received: by blackcat.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8293A5EB0; Sat, 12 Mar 2005 01:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:16:59 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20050312005124.GU16527@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20050312005124.GU16527@chain.digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503112016.59962.phma@phma.hn.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9565 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.hn.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 X-eGroups-From: Pierre Abbat From: Pierre Abbat Reply-To: phma@phma.hn.org Subject: [lojban] Re: [Archivists] skapi vs. pilka? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23928 On Friday 11 March 2005 19:51, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > Mail between xorxes: > > I think this is pilka more than skapi. > > skapi is the material, it is the pilka once > > it has been removed from the animal. > > and I: > > I disagree. skapi need not have been removed, and pilka includes > > fruit rinds and so on. I'm going to ask the archivists about > > this. I was wondering the same thing myself when coining {benpi'a}. I decided that since meninges are inside bone while epithelium is on the outside, they would be benpi'a and tatskapi. (Epithelium etymologically refers to the pink spot around the nipple.) -- Sans lunettes, je ne distingue même pas les odeurs... -Les Perles de la médecine