From ignat99@gmail.com Thu Mar 31 08:13:38 2005
Return-Path: <ignat99@gmail.com>
X-Sender: ignat99@gmail.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 69888 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2005 16:13:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.167)
  by m29.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 31 Mar 2005 16:13:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO wproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.184.193)
  by mta6.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Mar 2005 16:13:37 -0000
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so597995wra
        for <lojban@yahoogroups.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:13:36 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
        b=jhPVdKbqynsABLKzjWGyf7+y1NXd88gAeXfzwofsRlRmetsxod7B+eok5m+fjrCyL8AfMNi9PZ5gCKjfjyYIUyCg1cRzhyXgU3wWBZXhXBYO7zDFbBPjz+8vsfcPSNB3M6eIcSY9nMEQP6tI6kjKrsCx9rAtR0lLPzwmJ4SeP8o=
Received: by 10.54.45.12 with SMTP id s12mr1857395wrs;
        Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:13:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.6.71 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 08:13:33 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <b2bc9fd4050331081363837bae@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:13:33 +0900
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
In-Reply-To: <b2bc9fd405033107537f6089d5@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <b2bc9fd405032920461f7cd1c4@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4c4e58c10503300651201dda8d@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b2bc9fd40503301521102efe7b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050331003643.GI14109@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <b2bc9fd4050330173551fe8af@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20050331022441.GA5950@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
	 <b2bc9fd40503301901446cea7a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <12d58c1605033107085b219813@mail.gmail.com>
	 <b2bc9fd405033107537f6089d5@mail.gmail.com>
X-Originating-IP: 64.233.184.193
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
From: ignat 99 <ignat99@gmail.com>
Reply-To: ignat 99 <ignat99@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: fu'ivla
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=219030699
X-Yahoo-Profile: ignat999
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24089

coi rodo

Etruscans <-> eto_rus_(lo rusko ku) <-> rysich (name of old rus)

ch <-> (ch      .tcriyviys. bu      tcys. bu)
This letter and sound is absent in Lojban

Take the good alphabet:
http://ccbs.ntu.edu.tw/DBLM/olcourse/sanskrit/s-alpha-1.htm
or
http://www.lojban.org/en/publications/reference_grammar/chapter17.html#s17
+ old letterals

:-))

ki'e
ignat

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:08:10 -0500, Adam COOPER <lojban-out@lojban.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:01:46 +0900, ignat 99 <ignat99@gmail.com> wrote:
> > coi rodo
> > But Old Russian alphabet has 44 letters and new has 33.
> > But in the American alphabet only 24 letters. It is still less in
> > lojban. It means one Russian letter necessary to transfer by several
> > American. But more rational it would be make vice versa.  As the base
> > to take the Russian alphabet, but not American alphabet.
> >
> > But now, for the transfer of one letter in lojban, I must use 4-5 letters?
>
> AFAIK The focus of the Loglan/Lojban project was primarily meaning:
> one ought to be able to express any concept in Lojban. Phonologically,
> it makes sense to *minimize* the number of phonemes in the language,
> in order to maximize pronounceability of the language for all people.
>
> If you want to translate an Old Russian text for international
> understanding, Lojban is a good choice. If you want to *transliterate*
> an Old Russian text for international pronunciation, a good bet is
> IPA.
>
> By the way, Evgeny is right. It's not the American alphabet. The
> Americans got it from the British, who got it from the Romans, who got
> it from the Etruscans, who got it (I think) from the Phoenicians in
> about 600 BC or so. Sorry -- BCE.
>
> mu'o mi'e .adam.
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe, send mail to lojban-unsubscribe@onelist.com
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>