From dean@VISI.COM Thu Mar 10 14:13:37 2005
Return-Path: <dean@visi.com>
X-Sender: dean@visi.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 79532 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2005 22:13:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 10 Mar 2005 22:13:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO conn.mc.mpls.visi.com) (208.42.156.2)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2005 22:13:34 -0000
Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8])
	by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4867782C8; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:13:34 -0600 (CST)
Received: by isis.visi.com (Postfix, from userid 2278)
	id 0D76976C5C; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:13:34 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To: <20050310213656.GB16527@chain.digitalkingdom.org> from Robin Lee
 Powell at "Mar 10, 2005 01:36:56 pm"
To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:13:33 -0600 (CST)
Cc: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL66 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20050310221334.0D76976C5C@isis.visi.com>
X-Originating-IP: 208.42.156.2
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
X-eGroups-From: dean@visi.com (Dean Gahlon)
From: dean@VISI.COM
Subject: Re: [lojban] Re: Spam markings
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=810654
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 23923

> 
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:28:53PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:24:54PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:16:23PM -0600, dean@VISI.COM wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Would it be possible for the spam headers on messages to be
> > > > eliminated if the spam score is negative (as it appears to be
> > > > for the most recent messages)? 
> > > 
> > > It's probably possible, but I haven't the slightest idea how to
> > > do it.  I just followed the exiscan instructions when I set it
> > > up.
> > > 
> > > Actually, I could do it with formail.  I'll see what I can do.
> > 
> > Test of same.
> 
> Didn't work.  Turned off giant header; wasn't providing enough value
> to make up for two seperate complaints.
> 
> -Robin
> 

Thank you.  I actually wouldn't mind the header if the message was in
fact spam, but a header giving the reasons why something *isn't* spam,
along with a preview of the message that's reformatted into
illegibility, plus its double appearance, overflowed my
silent-tolerance limits. 

In response to your other message, it turns out that I can set my
email reader to ignore headers, although it isn't entirely easy to do
so. 

Dean Gahlon
dean@visi.com