From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Apr 28 14:21:40 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:21:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRGRx-0000hp-0Q
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:21:33 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.197])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRGRu-0000gt-Qj
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:21:32 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so791041wri
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=cjfb+5F1AjUic+mUyPdAcmgizZCf83tzKIWCkgH0+3wieNnqq4IJFcFJOBG1Wj7IY+nyDjLxFCj3v4cM2UKK8KnvRqjog3dUCududfxec9Jt3Z+Bgxsm6bCmAvi17Zrfwxl3yfIhDgnoGEX7VSp+QJy0TrRBKLv9FLp9RM3kVks=
Received: by 10.54.120.9 with SMTP id s9mr977183wrc;
        Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 14:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d175605042814201e0bfcca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:20:57 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: It is easier for a kumte...
In-Reply-To: <20050428201940.GH29072@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050428201940.GH29072@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9895
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 4/28/05, Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> It is easier for a kumte to pass through the kanla of a jesni than
> for me to understand some of the gismu list stuff.
> 
> *grin*
> 
> "kanla" includes "kumte" in its c.f. list:
> 
> (cf. jvinu, kerlo, viska, kumte)
> 
> What is up with that?

Whatever it is, it works both  ways, because "kumte"
includes "kanla" in its cf. list as well:

(cf. sunla, kanla, xirma, xasli)

mu'o mi'e xorxes