From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 29 07:56:36 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWur-00033K-AX
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:29 -0700
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.202])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWul-000337-Su
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:29 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so992991rne
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=XCMhu1SXN326elnYtbRXs2nR44C5Q3jv6TUIBa3rYAbw8HsaTTIlfCn7WX0J1BH8iUbj4IvDKzpZ5xQa/PScyEL6DgILbbLDH+uQSyGRSl3mlW3qMlHkck8yRPNA6aC8NuDzoHUe7LyNPxu8d/RNKpaW8csyHyKzewB+Q910yLU=
Received: by 10.38.67.69 with SMTP id p69mr3694785rna;
        Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.152.16 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4c4e58c105042907566a0f16ca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:56:22 +0100
From: Evgeny Sklyanin <eks2005@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: It is easier for a kumte...
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504291411450.9464@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050429005847.57647.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504291411450.9464@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9903
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: eks2005@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 4/29/05, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, John E Clifford wrote:
> 
> >
> > --- Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 4/28/05, Robin Lee Powell
> >> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "kanla" includes "kumte" in its c.f. list:
> >>>
> >>> (cf. jvinu, kerlo, viska, kumte)
> >>>
> >>> What is up with that?
> >>
> >> Whatever it is, it works both  ways, because
> >> "kumte"
> >> includes "kanla" in its cf. list as well:
> >>
> >> (cf. sunla, kanla, xirma, xasli)
> >>
> > A remote possibility: the old word for "camel"
> > was {kamla} and confusion ensued.
> 
> That's what I thought, too, but it turns out not to be the case. Loglan
> "kamla" = Lojban "klama"; and Loglan "kanla" = Lojban "naxle".
> 

OK, here is my suggestion: {kanla} in the cf list for {kumte} was
mistyped for {kanba} which looks quite appropriate: (cf. sunla, kanba,
xirma, xasli). Then the reverse link was automatically transferred to
{kanla}.