From opi_lauma@yahoo.com Mon Apr 25 03:49:37 2005
Return-Path: <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>
X-Sender: opi_lauma@yahoo.com
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 52125 invoked from network); 25 Apr 2005 10:49:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
  by m25.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 Apr 2005 10:49:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO web32105.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.207.119)
  by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Apr 2005 10:49:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 9765 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Apr 2005 10:49:36 -0000
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
Message-ID: <20050425104936.9763.qmail@web32105.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Received: from [141.2.216.130] by web32105.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:49:36 PDT
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 03:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Originating-IP: 68.142.207.119
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
From: Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@yahoo.com>
Subject: se selbri1 selbri2
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=216990827
X-Yahoo-Profile: opi_lauma
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24237

coi

I would like again to ask about {nanla ckule} and
{ckule co nanla}. According to the list of gismu {x1
is a boy/lad [young male person] of age x2 immature by
standard x3}. Since {nanla ckule} is {boy's school}
one can conclude that construction {selbri1 selbri2}
(as well as {selbri2 co selbri1}) extracts the first
argument of {selbri1}. Another arguments of {selbri1}
(such as "age" and "immaturity standard") do not take
a part in the meaning of {selbri1 selbri2}. Can one
somehow extract these arguments of {selbri1} to modify
with there usage selbri2. For example {se selbri1
selbri2} (se nanla ckule). Does this construction mean
{school of age}, or {te nanla ckule} means {school of
immaturity standard}?

co'omi'e .opilaumas

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com