From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Apr 15 13:46:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 712 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2005 20:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m16.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 15 Apr 2005 20:46:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 15 Apr 2005 20:46:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DMXeo-00039v-QS for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:43:18 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DMXe7-000399-Kt; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:38 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DMXdw-00038s-8y for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:24 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.199]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DMXdt-00038E-9N for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:42:24 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so910707wri for ; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:41:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.5.61 with SMTP id 61mr160505wre; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.69.3 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d175605041513407dceff1d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:40:56 -0300 In-Reply-To: <20050415201429.GB9654@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050414194642.GR15911@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050414201420.GT15911@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050415193816.GG13636@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d175605041512551ca0b8a3@mail.gmail.com> <20050415201429.GB9654@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9843 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 X-eGroups-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= Reply-To: jjllambias@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: {zdile} mi na nelci zo bai X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24201 On 4/15/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > I was rhyming solely on "ai". If there's something wrong with > "REMpai" for that purpose, I don't get it. For two lines to rhyme, the last stressed vowel and everything after it must be identical in both lines, so REMpai will rhyme only with things that end in EMpai. The others will all rhyme if they are stressed. It is possible to use less stringent rhymes, for example allow {EMpai} to rhyme with {EMbai}, and things like that, but relaxing the stress rule is too much for me. mu'o mi'e xorxes