From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Apr 29 07:58:05 2005
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 75880 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2005 14:58:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216)
  by m26.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 29 Apr 2005 14:58:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2005 14:58:04 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWvc-000346-Q1
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:57:16 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWv2-00033V-C4; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:42 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWur-00033K-AX
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:29 -0700
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.202])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DRWul-000337-Su
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:29 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id f1so992991rne
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.67.69 with SMTP id p69mr3694785rna;
        Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.152.16 with HTTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2005 07:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4c4e58c105042907566a0f16ca@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 15:56:22 +0100
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504291411450.9464@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050429005847.57647.qmail@web81309.mail.yahoo.com>
	 <Pine.LNX.4.60.0504291411450.9464@hagbart.nvg.ntnu.no>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 9903
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: eks2005@gmail.com
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
X-eGroups-From: Evgeny Sklyanin <eks2005@gmail.com>
From: Evgeny Sklyanin <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: eks2005@gmail.com
Subject: [lojban] Re: It is easier for a kumte...
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24271

On 4/29/05, Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, John E Clifford wrote:
> 
> >
> > --- Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 4/28/05, Robin Lee Powell
> >> <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> "kanla" includes "kumte" in its c.f. list:
> >>>
> >>> (cf. jvinu, kerlo, viska, kumte)
> >>>
> >>> What is up with that?
> >>
> >> Whatever it is, it works both  ways, because
> >> "kumte"
> >> includes "kanla" in its cf. list as well:
> >>
> >> (cf. sunla, kanla, xirma, xasli)
> >>
> > A remote possibility: the old word for "camel"
> > was {kamla} and confusion ensued.
> 
> That's what I thought, too, but it turns out not to be the case. Loglan
> "kamla" = Lojban "klama"; and Loglan "kanla" = Lojban "naxle".
> 

OK, here is my suggestion: {kanla} in the cf list for {kumte} was
mistyped for {kanba} which looks quite appropriate: (cf. sunla, kanba,
xirma, xasli). Then the reverse link was automatically transferred to
{kanla}.