From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat May 28 06:47:23 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 28 May 2005 06:47:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dc1ei-0007x3-RA
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 06:47:12 -0700
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.192])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Dc1ef-0007wL-Bb
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 28 May 2005 06:47:12 -0700
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1381072wra
        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Sat, 28 May 2005 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=QxyuwVDJ59cOHgqeb/r7QvY7L1ot3Y8J6DJnaC4dkZTTfW5JDh1+LSo1U45BvyRnJ+f6yJQCCz5lXlWtqFyLoMkz6N+4N5wYIO/0BJ01FKISSwnmBTRwTeVOqgDh3CBDRf4xxk2e8Zx2FJgOmgJcj9ycjNoTqtnIi+8iqZwKcWc=
Received: by 10.54.141.10 with SMTP id o10mr2047486wrd;
        Sat, 28 May 2005 06:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2005 06:48:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d1756050528064838888ab2@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 10:48:26 -0300
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Again {lo}.
In-Reply-To: <20050528124037.54870.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <20050528124037.54870.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
X-archive-position: 10075
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 5/28/05, John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Well, someone said that {lo gerku cu xagrai pendo
> lo remna} could not mean (I think they actually
> said "does not mean", but that amounts to the
> same thing in context) "Some dog is best friend
> to some man."

Not at all. Especially when followed by: "Or at least, not *necessarily*."

{lo gerku cu xagrai pendo lo remna} does not necessarily mean
the same as "at least one dog is best friend to at least one human",
but it could eventually mean that given the appropriate context.

> However, if it can mean that, there
> is no real argument here and I don't quite see
> what the problem is.  So far as I can tell, no
> one is claiming that it can't mean "The dog is
> man's best friend" too. 

Excellent.

 However, stressing that
> it is one rather than the other is just
> misleading. 

Nobody did that. All that was stressed is that it is not exclusively
the other.

 Perhaps it would be better to sit
> down and try to explain under what conditions it
> means one rather than the other -- and what
> exactly the difference is.

Well, without more context I would almost certainly interpret it in the
adage sense, just as I would interpret a tensless sentence out of
context in an atemporal sense. It requires a much stronger context to
interpret it as "some dog will be, two days from now and for a duration
of 37 minutes, best friend to some human." It could eventually mean 
that, but it's highly unlikely.

mu'o mi'e xorxes