From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue May 03 13:50:17 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 03 May 2005 13:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DT4LJ-0005oi-MH for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 13:50:09 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.196]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DT4LG-0005o9-P0 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 03 May 2005 13:50:09 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so1952365wri for ; Tue, 03 May 2005 13:49:33 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LL3qvwsYJcmTe5i8z29aR6P4eSK2xkBJePga34vMeEXpg3IiRQLnh/6mabCadpjJg5+SiQuhth2xnu7ePE9WNx1ZZU6Fwp34YfTbCOdi/xEw+KCJNcGDjf/KhfJuB6NiAFNbJnolKNvQBjj1UcoudTEFwggF/1IqwF3wmA13urY= Received: by 10.54.114.18 with SMTP id m18mr1320178wrc; Tue, 03 May 2005 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.67.20 with HTTP; Tue, 3 May 2005 13:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d175605050313494f45d4da@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 17:49:32 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: LNC now longest Lojban work. In-Reply-To: <20050503195041.GG29072@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050503192234.GD29072@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <925d17560505031237319666ac@mail.gmail.com> <20050503195041.GG29072@chain.digitalkingdom.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 9917 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 5/3/05, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:37:39PM -0300, Jorge Llamb?as wrote: > > There's also certain copyright violating translation that must be > > around those figures. > > Really? Can you get an exact number? Not that I support such a > thing, but I'm curious. I'm not sure how to count them: > > That's an excellent way of enticing minors to read something, pity > > there are none around to read it :) > > I've met at least two minors (defined in my jurisdiction as under 18 > years of age) on #lojban, actually, so I think you're mistaken > there. ui xamgu mu'o mi'e xorxes