From MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Thu May 05 04:27:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 33616 invoked from network); 5 May 2005 11:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.217) by m24.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 May 2005 11:27:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta2.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 May 2005 11:27:27 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DTeSc-0002hR-LR for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:24:06 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTeRu-0002gW-JK; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:23:27 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 05 May 2005 04:23:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DTeRe-0002gN-Fy for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:23:06 -0700 Received: from imo-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.36]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DTeRa-0002fh-Nd for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 05 May 2005 04:23:06 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-d04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id d.129.5c636b04 (48576) for ; Thu, 5 May 2005 07:22:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <129.5c636b04.2fab5bef@wmconnect.com> Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 07:22:23 EDT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_129.5c636b04.2fab5bef_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 52 X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 9927 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Reply-To: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Subject: [lojban] conlang works X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=137764184 X-Yahoo-Profile: lojbaner X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24300 --part1_129.5c636b04.2fab5bef_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/5/2005 5:22:42 AM Eastern Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > > It's interesting that Lojban beats Klingon by a mile in this > > regard, as I believe that Klingon has many more fluent speakers > > than Lojban. > > Dosen't surprise me in the slightest. The problem is people's loose > usage of the word "fluent". Klingon's vocabulary is *incredibly* > poor. Much worse than Lojban's. I've heard of at least one > parent(s) who tried to raise their kids speaking Kling but > failed/gave up because there were just too many things they couldn't > talk about. > > -Robin > True on all counts (except I think I know what "fluent" means). stevo --part1_129.5c636b04.2fab5bef_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 5/5/2005 5:22:42= AM Eastern Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


> It's interesting tha= t Lojban beats Klingon by a mile in this
> regard, as I believe that Klingon has many more fluent speakers
> than Lojban.

Dosen't surprise me in the slightest.  The problem is people's loo= se
usage of the word "fluent".  Klingon's vocabulary is *incredibly*
poor.  Much worse than Lojban's.  I've heard of at least one
parent(s) who tried to raise their kids speaking Kling but
failed/gave up because there were just too many things they couldn't
talk about.

-Robin


True on all counts (except I think I know what "fluent" means).

stevo --part1_129.5c636b04.2fab5bef_boundary--