From lojban-out@lojban.org Wed May 25 14:27:01 2005
Return-Path: <lojban-out@lojban.org>
X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org
X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
Received: (qmail 45764 invoked from network); 25 May 2005 21:27:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (66.218.66.166)
  by m29.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 25 May 2005 21:27:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134)
  by mta5.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 May 2005 21:27:00 -0000
Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Db3O8-0006ZL-SF
	for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:26:05 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Db3NY-0006Yj-44; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:25:31 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 25 May 2005 14:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Db3NK-0006YU-Gx
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:25:14 -0700
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Db3NG-0006YM-Ih
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 14:25:14 -0700
Received: from p54A08D14.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.160.141.20] (helo=[192.168.178.21])
	by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis),
	id 0ML25U-1Db3O72sJJ-0000UM; Wed, 25 May 2005 23:26:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4294ED81.6030700@online.de>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 23:26:25 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <428F4B9C.8040300@yandex.ru>	 <925d1756050521105862cde0a3@mail.gmail.com>	 <42906975.4010100@yandex.ru> <925d1756050522125392ad8@mail.gmail.com>	 <4291E9D2.6040403@yandex.ru>	 <925d1756050524055021ffdd11@mail.gmail.com>	 <429365A8.9050106@yandex.ru> <91c7f6ff05052511046b19c162@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <91c7f6ff05052511046b19c162@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:5e2e22a5d422cd51ce0171a884c92cf6
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 10049
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: KSchmir@online.de
X-list: lojban-list
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
To: lojban@yahoogroups.com
X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134
X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0
X-eGroups-From: klaus schmirler <KSchmir@online.de>
From: klaus schmirler <lojban-out@lojban.org>
Reply-To: KSchmir@online.de
Subject: [lojban] Re: lujvo cmene etc
X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=OgLl6Vk3_rtq1LirZrvO7y8oSPTMdsQUmNv5-oCCZ8JzL3FYGg
X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out
X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24420

Mike Luevane wrote:

>It's called "filk" in english. Someone else with more brainpower than
>myself can probably come up with a suitable lojban word :)
>  
>
No! In many languages, English among them, there is a word for the reuse 
of a melody  just because the melody is there, with no idea of a 
spoofing a song or anything. Just like you change the name in Happy 
Birthday. And as Alekseiy says, the word is "parody" in a less common 
but perfectly acceptable meaning. Ditto for the guy with the brainpower.

klaus