From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jun 09 08:44:10 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DgPCL-0000hE-FK
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:44:01 -0700
Received: from web81310.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.85])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DgPCJ-0000h5-ED
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:44:01 -0700
Message-ID: <20050609154358.95018.qmail@web81310.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [65.69.50.91] by web81310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:43:58 PDT
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:43:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: John E Clifford <clifford-j@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: [lojban] Re: {lo}, {lu'o}, and {loi}.
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: 6667
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
X-archive-position: 10117
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: clifford-j@sbcglobal.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--- Opi Lauma <opi_lauma@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I meant that three persons carry one piano,
> they do it
> together, they cary the same piano at the same
> time. I
> thought that I cannot use {lu'o} since sentence
> with
> {lu'o} will mean that AT LEAST ONE of the group
> carry
> piano and I wanted to emphasize that ALL of
> them carry
> piano. I also could not use {lo} or {le} since
> I
> wanted to emphasize that they do it TOGETHER
> (that
> same time the same piano) and {lo}/{le} can
> mean that
> they carry piano INDIVIDUALLY. Now I think that
> I need
> to use {loi}, isn't?
> 
Yes