From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 14 16:48:21 2005
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:48:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DiL8d-0007y5-B6
	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:48:11 -0700
Received: from 70-32-97-160.ontrca.adelphia.net ([70.32.97.160] helo=[192.168.1.42])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1DiL8Y-0007xk-L0
	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:48:11 -0700
Subject: [lojban] Re: zoi ky. source code ky.
From: Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20050614223704.GV13307@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
References: <42AD93AD.20005@yandex.ru> <1118773769.7744.15.camel@localhost>
	 <20050614223704.GV13307@chain.digitalkingdom.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-TQTSCTrzR1meLFvQNaTn"
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:48:27 -0700
Message-Id: <1118792907.7744.20.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.3.2 
X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--)
X-archive-position: 10165
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: treed@surreality.us
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list


--=-TQTSCTrzR1meLFvQNaTn
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 15:37 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote:
> > samselpla (http://www.lojban.org/jbovlaste/dict/samselpla) is the
> > generally accepted term for computerized plans, unfortunately,
> > this can apply to both source code and compiled binaries.=20
>=20
> Actually, no:
>=20
> x1=3Dp2 is computer program source code created by x2=3Dp1 with intended
> result (state/process) x3=3Dp3=3Ds2 on computer x4=3Ds1

Who's to say that executable binary code can not be source code?

Further, how does this apply to interpreted languages?

> > I've suggested making new words to delineate between samselpla
> > which is in a condition to be executed,=20
>=20
> samtci or samru'e

I *really* don't see samselpla which is in a condition to be executed as
samru'e. Maybe ka'e samru'e, but not samru'e. samtci I suppose works.

> > and samselpla which must still be prepared.
>=20
> samselpla

See above.

Additionally, the definition in jbovlaste doesn't vibe with the way I've
been using it, and I wonder just when it was added and who decided to
restrict it so.
--=20
Theodore Reed <treed@surreality.us>

--=-TQTSCTrzR1meLFvQNaTn
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCr2zLw24JwM4aDNwRAtk1AKDwV2sowPvwZiYlTM9eAcE2Tget4QCfbM3L
mQu9nqkOthffGNzM/XUN5H0=
=IgTY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-TQTSCTrzR1meLFvQNaTn--