From lojban-out@lojban.org Tue Jun 14 16:56:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 91271 invoked from network); 14 Jun 2005 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m23.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 14 Jun 2005 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jun 2005 23:56:57 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiLH6-0008HO-F0 for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:56 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DiLGp-0008Gg-GU; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:43 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiLGc-0008GT-0Y for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:26 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1DiLGb-0008GM-Ns for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:25 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:56:25 -0700 Message-ID: <20050614235625.GZ13307@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <42AD93AD.20005@yandex.ru> <1118773769.7744.15.camel@localhost> <20050614223704.GV13307@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <1118792907.7744.20.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118792907.7744.20.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-archive-position: 10166 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -5.4 (-----) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 X-eGroups-From: Robin Lee Powell From: Robin Lee Powell Reply-To: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Subject: [lojban] Re: zoi ky. source code ky. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=-zxR6cAx1qj6KGn63WZEQCUywQCxZ0fjFYxs7LyRZ2XGsY4xbg X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24537 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:48:27PM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 15:37 -0700, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 11:29:29AM -0700, Theodore Reed wrote: > > > samselpla (http://www.lojban.org/jbovlaste/dict/samselpla) is > > > the generally accepted term for computerized plans, > > > unfortunately, this can apply to both source code and compiled > > > binaries. > > > > Actually, no: > > > > x1=p2 is computer program source code created by x2=p1 with > > intended result (state/process) x3=p3=s2 on computer x4=s1 > > Who's to say that executable binary code can not be source code? Erm. Standard usage? > Further, how does this apply to interpreted languages? Poorly. -Robin -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/