From opi_lauma@yahoo.com Thu Jun 09 06:41:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: opi_lauma@yahoo.com X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 95400 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2005 13:41:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m21.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 9 Jun 2005 13:41:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web33412.mail.mud.yahoo.com) (68.142.206.144) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jun 2005 13:41:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 20754 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jun 2005 13:41:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20050609134124.20752.qmail@web33412.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [141.2.216.130] by web33412.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:41:23 PDT Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 06:41:23 -0700 (PDT) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: 68.142.206.144 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0 From: Opi Lauma Subject: Re: {lo}, {lu'o}, and {loi}. X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=216990827; y=GlDu-FonRaQV4Chn21wCY2IWNkdrgnZfvtj9oWNdTOtge5Y7 X-Yahoo-Profile: opi_lauma X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24485 I meant that three persons carry one piano, they do it together, they cary the same piano at the same time. I thought that I cannot use {lu'o} since sentence with {lu'o} will mean that AT LEAST ONE of the group carry piano and I wanted to emphasize that ALL of them carry piano. I also could not use {lo} or {le} since I wanted to emphasize that they do it TOGETHER (that same time the same piano) and {lo}/{le} can mean that they carry piano INDIVIDUALLY. Now I think that I need to use {loi}, isn't? __________________________________ Discover Yahoo! Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing and more. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/stayintouch.html