From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 05 13:23:44 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E18j9-0002QO-2I for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:23:35 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.204]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E18j5-0002QH-Nm for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:23:34 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so749744wra for ; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ngxKkG1i3VYXulYoHbq0maRxamTjN2GZv2FG9C85M59vCtEWhA18uzut/UaeSTmBviYtwsy5DARDy5+7ioDqWrhK85tl4TreJPS0f+/eULtVPXp9/8CjFA3IH8wREIypXHSr7Y7noK9/H40EnIklOZixyB40tdSiXDH0VwVPphg= Received: by 10.54.144.7 with SMTP id r7mr2813709wrd; Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.68.12 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2005 13:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560508051323616ccd1a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 17:23:30 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: the meter is a unit of length In-Reply-To: <20050805193301.99167.qmail@web81308.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <925d175605080511385cf3b571@mail.gmail.com> <20050805193301.99167.qmail@web81308.mail.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10314 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 8/5/05, John E Clifford wrote: > I guess that I don't see a property of having a > value here. We have a function {le ni ce'u > blanu} which gives different values for the same > argument at different times (i.e., the function > -- or the argument -- needs a place for time), > that is all that is claimed (and, of course, it > is not literally claimed to be about different > times; it might as well be about different places > on the picture, as might the sentence about being > blue). I am puzzled by what {cenba3} might be; it > looks like another reading on another scale. I take it that cenba3 is the amount of change, which, unlike cenba2, is a value. For example: le mi daski cu cenba lo ka ce'u vasru lo rupnu be li xo kau kei li re no My pocket changes in how many dollars it contains by amount 20. That doesn't say whether it increased or decreased, so probably zenba/jdika would be more common in a case like that. {cenba} would be used when there is no intrinsic order of values. ... > See above: it seems to be just the difference > between the value {ni x blanu}(for a particular > identified x) and the function {ni ce'u blanu}, > with the same meaning of {ni} That's the difference, yes, but the meaning of {ni} is not the same when going from a value to a function. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.