From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Aug 26 14:39:16 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8luk-0000fO-Qj for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:06 -0700 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8luh-0000f9-Qh for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:06 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h31so336773wxd for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Iw4XZ2yCrNaNZL/BNarqWV5id+7BFd4NiHX2UrAkT5VifXD8DFS0yWVIL2WyBEUSnYUPt90XTnSRDZWQYRvr+ZbJXEjWaKpTDI/v8Ki0U8jK7klJoHBO2mCg/YnMbA0nBU0AJxo8j3fA/ENxnUN9zvLbe0Hgs+g1C/CiyEnt6Ok= Received: by 10.70.69.4 with SMTP id r4mr58719wxa; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.2 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <12d58c160508261439c0e62b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:39:02 -0400 From: Adam COOPER To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: fanva lo nuzba In-Reply-To: <925d175605082612453b577c32@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466" References: <12d58c160508261114515f9b45@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082612453b577c32@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-archive-position: 10453 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/26/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >=20 > On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER wrote: > >=20 > Maybe: {su'o ci xasycribe cu sepli loi nanmu > lo mitre ru'e be li 20}? That's a clever use of {ru'e}. Would {su'o ci xasycribe cu milxe sepli loi= =20 nanmu lo mitre be li 20} be acceptable? ------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/26/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER <adamg= arrigus@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>

Maybe: {su'o ci xas= ycribe cu sepli loi nanmu
lo mitre ru'e be li 20}?

That's a clever use of {ru'e}. Would {su'o ci xasycribe cu milxe sepli loi = nanmu lo mitre be li 20} be acceptable?

------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.