Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 95900 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2005 05:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.218) by m34.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 20 Aug 2005 05:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta3.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2005 05:49:34 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6MEV-0005Dk-PE for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:49:31 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E6MD9-0005Ca-0p; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:48:11 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 19 Aug 2005 22:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E6JKn-0002md-7J for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:43:49 -0700 Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr ([193.252.22.23]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E6JKk-0002mV-IK for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:43:49 -0700 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0808.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 81C9E1C00243 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:43:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.9online.fr (ADijon-153-1-52-10.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.75.10]) by mwinf0808.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 031B61C00242 for ; Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:43:44 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20050820024345128.031B61C00242@mwinf0808.wanadoo.fr Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 04:43:34 +0200 References: <8f2fd4aa05081914224807c5d9@mail.gmail.com> Organization: 9Online Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <8f2fd4aa05081914224807c5d9@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera M2/8.01 (Win32, build 7642) Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-archive-position: 10418 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: david.koch@9online.fr X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: "David KOCH" From: "David KOCH" Reply-To: david.koch@9online.fr Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban Designs X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=zwuisPxPueZ_9eFuefPPcpi2CVXKFz1gIC5McU0uBHgUU3IH6g X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24797 Content-Length: 3573 Lines: 82 I think that the Lojban's logo have more sense than Nike's. At least Lojban'logo tend to express the mathematical background of the language... For me the logo is enough by itself. Clear design, historical reasons, many things that make the Lojban logo unique, even the arrows at both ends of the axis, which makes it distinguable from a simple mathematic draft :) koCiz Le Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:22:45 +0200, Brandon Wirick a écrit: > Xah has been expressing distaste for the Lojban logo, and it got me > thinking. I am not totally satisfied with the logo, but for different > reasons. I do not intend to bad-mouth anyone; I have a lot of respect > for Iojbo culture and the logo that flies as its banner. I just think > the purpose of the logo is undefined, and that shows in the design. > Corporations and products have logos for advertisement and branding > reasons. Nations have flags for cultural reasons. Lojban leans towards > both and so its logo seems to be in an awkward design-space between > flags and corporate logos. > > The logo doesn't look like a flag. Compare it to the others on > lojban.org. Something about thin lines, arrowheads, and recognizable > symbols make it seem less than prestigious, like Lojbanistan is a > weak, weird nation. Ever since I saw the Rwandan flag, with the big > black 'R' in the middle, I thought Rwanda was some sort of wannabe > country. Although Lojbanistan is a virtual nation (I won't degrade the > culture by calling it an "imaginary country") it shouldn't give the > impression that it lacks authenticity. > > The logo doesn't look corporate. Corporations spend money on artists > that craft imagery with precision and style, tucking away obvious > features and simplifying shapes in order to create interest. It is a > fact, not a judgment, that the LLG has not done this. This is not bad, > because what is the LLG selling? What is the LLG trying to brand? A > whole language? Hopefully not. However, it's not hard to create a > commodity based on a concept. Almost anything can be made into a line > of tee-shirts and a coffee mugs. > > I think that eventually Lojbanistan and the LLG's endorsements should > become more visible than Lojban itself, so as to make people > subliminally embarassed for not knowing what Lojban is. As people > develop really neat technology built around Lojban, then people can > say, "What do you mean, 'What's Lojban'? Please tell me you've heard > of Project X... yeah, that's based completely on Lojban," and "Hey, > have you gotten any virtual citizenships yet? I applied in > Lojbanistan." > > Just as a brainstorm, I made a couple designs based on the existing > logo, that kind of indicate where I see Lojban going in the future. > Here's a flag idea: http://www.calpoly.edu/~bwirick/jbolanci.gif > Here's, like, a tee-shirt design: > http://www.calpoly.edu/~bwirick/jbocpi.gif > (Forgive the image quality; I don't have Illustrator) > > If anyone out there is doing something relevant to either of these, > I'd love to know about it. > > Brandon Wirick > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to > lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > -- KOCH David aka Kochise To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.