From lojban-out@lojban.org Fri Aug 26 14:40:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Sender: lojban-out@lojban.org X-Apparently-To: lojban@yahoogroups.com Received: (qmail 21760 invoked from network); 26 Aug 2005 21:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m31.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 26 Aug 2005 21:40:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO chain.digitalkingdom.org) (64.81.49.134) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 26 Aug 2005 21:40:18 -0000 Received: from lojban-out by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8lvs-0000gs-JJ for lojban@yahoogroups.com; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:40:16 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.49.134]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8lv2-0000fb-H1; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:25 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1E8luk-0000fO-Qj for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:06 -0700 Received: from xproxy.gmail.com ([66.249.82.192]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1E8luh-0000f9-Qh for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:06 -0700 Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h31so336773wxd for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.69.4 with SMTP id r4mr58719wxa; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.115.2 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:39:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <12d58c160508261439c0e62b7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:39:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <925d175605082612453b577c32@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466" References: <12d58c160508261114515f9b45@mail.gmail.com> <925d175605082612453b577c32@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) X-archive-position: 10453 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: adamgarrigus@gmail.com X-list: lojban-list X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-) To: lojban@yahoogroups.com X-Originating-IP: 64.81.49.134 X-eGroups-Msg-Info: 1:12:0:0 X-eGroups-From: Adam COOPER From: Adam COOPER Reply-To: adamgarrigus@gmail.com Subject: [lojban] Re: fanva lo nuzba X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=116389790; y=E5lXp8KF5KtVPmUoSTHFj6_7YHeOcExnsC_hmLXeYe3J_dzR3A X-Yahoo-Profile: lojban_out X-Yahoo-Message-Num: 24833 ------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/26/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas wrote: >=20 > On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER wrote: > >=20 > Maybe: {su'o ci xasycribe cu sepli loi nanmu > lo mitre ru'e be li 20}? That's a clever use of {ru'e}. Would {su'o ci xasycribe cu milxe sepli loi= =20 nanmu lo mitre be li 20} be acceptable? ------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On 8/26/05, Jorge Llamb=EDas <jjllambias@gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/26/05, Adam COOPER <adamg= arrigus@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>

Maybe: {su'o ci xas= ycribe cu sepli loi nanmu
lo mitre ru'e be li 20}?

That's a clever use of {ru'e}. Would {su'o ci xasycribe cu milxe sepli loi = nanmu lo mitre be li 20} be acceptable?

------=_Part_10559_16059844.1125092342466--