From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Sep 06 13:34:25 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:34:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECk92-0006l6-53 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:34:16 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1ECk91-0006kw-FU; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 13:34:15 -0700 Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:34:15 -0700 To: Christopher Zervic Cc: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V4 #181 Message-ID: <20050906203415.GB14692@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christopher Zervic , lojban-list@lojban.org References: <8f2fd4aa05082314183fdfdd8e@mail.gmail.com> <430DE8C6.1050500@yandex.ru> <8f2fd4aa05082515447a229b03@mail.gmail.com> <430F296E.9090909@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i From: Robin Lee Powell X-archive-position: 10523 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list This is probably a repost, and it's my fault. Sorry. -Robin On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 01:31:54PM -0400, Christopher Zervic wrote: > On 8/26/05, Aleksej R. Serdyukov wrote: > > Brandon Wirick wrote: > > > > A neat, simple, meaningful, conformist, modern-looking flag might just > > > be three vertical bars: black, grey, white. > > > > I was watching at these two... (see attach) and thought the vertical one > > is ugly (update: maybe no more so ;-) ), and the horizontal resembles > > the German flag (and Russian if > > reversed). > > Then I thought - a flag can be ugly. What shouldn't be ugly is ???? > > (heraldry or sth.). (Your jbocpi looks like a ????, and when I saw it > > first, I've checked if it was the Klingon logo ;-) A logo of something > > called "Claw" among some Star Trek pictures was similar... IIRC) > > > I had another idea, in which the three-dot "therefore" symbol was > employed, or some other symbol associated with predicate logic was > used (NOT lambda - "logos" - as this has other gayer connotations) > set in whatever colors and however displayed. They could be three > circles, evoking the rings of a 3-set Venn diagram. No one would > recognize the 2-set Venn diagram as such > > The current "flag" is too MS Painty for me to take seriously. > -- > Christopher Zervic, Esq. -- http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ Reason #237 To Learn Lojban: "Homonyms: Their Grate!" Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.