From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 12 11:25:35 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEsze-0006hv-0W for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:25:26 -0700 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.202]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EEszb-0006hn-9W for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:25:25 -0700 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i23so1774791wra for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:25:17 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=JbubuYOAm5E7hQSJ2HE/+KBgKXUgYn7VBIZFmFkOUL1KxTec4NhVxjDMU7KPfbzbVzyst9xtn06yt46pPrZ89vUvPrGcN/xeqjzM/rZJwexGLkPPkM+tMP0nTg0nXWG9oq3USvuncgr7+yp6q1clEgQGvTWrCMB+h5C69HrULpw= Received: by 10.54.100.11 with SMTP id x11mr2806476wrb; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.140.6 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:25:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:25:16 -0400 From: Matt Arnold To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: detcartu la renonoxanan. In-Reply-To: <8f2fd4aa05091023076b145da5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15203_27917983.1126549516916" References: <20050910205343.GZ23157@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050910220513.75480.qmail@web81302.mail.yahoo.com> <8f2fd4aa05091023076b145da5@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 10580 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_15203_27917983.1126549516916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Why should there be one official system of naming days and months? Can't we= =20 have many valid names for each day or month and let each person call it=20 whichever they wish depending on what culture they're in, without having to= =20 name that culture in the name of the day or month? I'm not opposed in=20 principle to having nomenclatures that include rafsi of the cultural contex= t=20 to which they apply, but if I use one that doesn't mention it, would I not= =20 be speaking Lojban? -epkat On 9/11/05, Brandon Wirick wrote: >=20 > How about calling them "Roman-type days," {la'ordei}? Sunday could be > "Sun-type Roman-type day," {solyla'ordei}. Yeah, it's inconvienient, > but it does not impose a culture on the Lojban community. It leaves > room for other concurrent systems that serve different purposes. > Jewish Lojbanists can use "One-type Hebrew-type day," {pavbrodei}. > Work-centric Lojbanists can number the weekdays and the weekends > separately, like: > Monday: {pavgundei} ("One-type work-type day") > Tuesday {relgundei} > Wednesday: {mibgundei} > Thursday: {vongundei} > Friday: {mumgundei} > Saturday: {pavysurdei} ("One-type relax-type day") > Sunday: {relsurdei} >=20 >=20 > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.or= g > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. >=20 > ------=_Part_15203_27917983.1126549516916 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Why should there be one official system of naming days and months? Can't we have many valid names for each day or month and let each person call it whichever they wish depending on what culture they're in, without having to name that culture in the name of the day or month? I'm not opposed in principle to having nomenclatures that include rafsi of the cultural context to which they apply, but if I use one that doesn't mention it, would I not be speaking Lojban?
-epkat

On 9/11/05, Brandon Wirick <b= randon@yrick.com> wrote:
How about calling them "Roman-type days," {la'ordei}? Sunday coul= d be
"Sun-type Roman-type day," {solyla'ordei}. Yeah, it's inc= onvienient,
but it does not impose a culture on the Lojban community. It= leaves
room for other concurrent systems that serve different purposes.
Jew= ish Lojbanists can use "One-type Hebrew-type day," {pavbrodei}.Work-centric Lojbanists can number the weekdays and the weekends
separ= ately, like:
Monday: {pavgundei} ("One-type work-type day")
Tuesday {re= lgundei}
Wednesday: {mibgundei}
Thursday: {vongundei}
Friday: {mum= gundei}
Saturday: {pavysurdei} ("One-type relax-type day")
Sunday: {relsurdei}


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail= to lojban-list-request@l= ojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to= secretary@lojban.org for help.=


------=_Part_15203_27917983.1126549516916-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.