From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 12 12:29:41 2005 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:37:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.52) id 1EEtzf-0007aW-45 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:31 -0700 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.199]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1EEtzZ-0007aM-Of for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:30 -0700 Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id k1so1537014nzf for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B8WsO4XnqKjEInYJ10DssoNncxne+BckZIm2tsc4Mv7wRpNhCgA2wYXn8BWdJugGJ4W24ZoMvwN46cIWpIT4N8DB5PUQ78L89kwQx24w/L3PenUACoU7KpkOMP4TXrjLdj6mYIAlxp1Y260eiY7jYh+eTNE8n8G0To7gCbndzkM= Received: by 10.36.132.12 with SMTP id f12mr182956nzd; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.36.8 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f2fd4aa05091212293270cde2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:29:20 -0700 From: Brandon Wirick To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: detcartu la renonoxanan. In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050910205343.GZ23157@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <20050910220513.75480.qmail@web81302.mail.yahoo.com> <8f2fd4aa05091023076b145da5@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 10583 X-Approved-By: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: brandon@yrick.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I like {nondjed.} I like the idea of the ISO standard being the default, with short names like {nondei} or {nondjed.}, and the ability to reference other systems of naming days with longer names. What are the advantages to using {cmene} vs. {lujvo} for this kind of thing? To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.